Council matchmaking: should councils aid us make friends?

Couple enjoying movie with popcorns in a cinema hall

Relationships are very good for us in a lot of techniques. Some of them blindingly apparent, others less so. Photograph: PhotosIndia.com LLC te /Alamy

Should government care about our relationships? Traditionally this question has been framed in terms of social conservatism and liberalism, an argument about whether or not the state need to privilege specific forms of relationships, notably marriage and the nuclear loved ones, over other people.

Increasingly we are seeing that rather of this social and moral argument there are great factors why government (and neighborhood government in certain) need to be concerned about the variety and top quality, although not, in truth, the kind of our relationships.

That’s since relationships are good for us in many techniques – some of them blindingly obvious, other folks much less so. Whilst it could be clear to us how intimate relationships, household and friends contribute to (or occasionally detract from) our nicely becoming, research more than the past decade has proven how relationships and social networks also support a selection of public items.

The American social scientists Christakis and Fowler have proven how both positive phenomena such as happiness and offering up smoking, and adverse ones such as weight problems, are transmitted through social networks. Investigation by the University of Brighton and others has proven that amounts of social interaction are 1 of the biggest determinants of wellbeing in previous age, far more critical even than physical health, and a vital portion of assisting men and women to dwell independently for longer.

Communities with substantial amounts of social capital, that is large levels of social connection, have greater outcomes in relation to wellness, educational attainment and social cohesion than communities in which social ties are weaker.

The nature of these relationships is not important: what counts is their variety and their strength.

This matters because we want a wholesale preventative shift if we are to handle the extended term crisis of demand and resource in public solutions. This is particularly accurate for neighborhood government which is responsible for those policy regions: care of the elderly, public well being, developing regional economies, in which innovation is most required.

Put crudely, if the last twenty years has been about regional government moving from delivering solutions to commissioning them, the up coming 20 many years will be about moving from commissioning companies to working with communities so that fewer providers are essential.

But even though public bodies are happy to advise us about consuming our five a day, cutting out the cigarettes and booze and investing in our pensions, they do not see it as their place to counsel us to commit a lot more time with our close friends, invest in our social networks and nurture our families.

But, arguably, these items, much more than any other people, will contribute most to our wellbeing (and reduce our need for pricey state assistance) above the lengthy term. So probably nearby councils ought to feel as much about relationships as about companies.

Of program, there are also useful factors that neighborhood authorities can do to construct sociability into communities, by way of planning, housing and the management of public space, and through versatile occupation creation and financial growth techniques. They can shift to the sort of personalised care that makes it possible for social speak to to be commissioned as an outcome, and they can look for to greater understand the networks of informal care and help that already exist in every single neighborhood and “piggyback” public providers on these.

But all of this requires a distinct way of considering about what a local authority is and what it is for. This contemplating is still in its infancy, but it’s getting to be more and more urgent.

Jonathan Carr-West is the chief executive of the Local Government Information Unit.

• Want your say? E mail sarah.marsh@theguardian.com to propose contributions to the network

Not presently a member? Join us now for far more comment, examination and the latest occupation options in nearby government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>