Do FDA Accredited HIV Tests Diagnose HIV Infection?

Since the starting of the so named “aids epidemic”, the whole world was taught how to decrease their possibility of contracting HIV by practicing protected intercourse, not sharing dirty needles when injecting street drugs etc. Along with methods to shield by yourself from HIV came the all effectively recognized propaganda campaign “know your status” and we had been all advised that the only way to know if you are infected with HIV is to get an HIV check. Most folks who get an HIV test do so believing that a optimistic check indicates infection and a adverse outcome both means that you are not infected or possibly you were lately contaminated and have not but developed antibodies to the virus yet and ought to be retested in the potential.

So how accurate is an HIV check? Does a positive consequence indicate without having a doubt that you are infected with Dr. Robert Gallo’s intercourse virus of mass destruction or are there situations exactly where a man or woman can check constructive due to a cross reaction, human error or a fallacy with the check itself? In accordance to the aids establishment, HIV exams are not only very precise in detecting the presence of HIV distinct antibodies but false positives are exceptionally uncommon.

“As proven by the specificity scores of 99.9% or over, the review gives reassurance that false positive outcomes are exceptionally rare – in other phrases, people who are HIV damaging do correctly get HIV-damaging final results.” page/2812847/

“Current generation HIV exams are regarded incredibly accurate. The blood-based HIV ELISA has a demonstrated sensitivity of among 99.3% to, with a specificity of amongst 99.91% and 99.97%. When combined with a Western blot, this translates to about a single false good out of each and every 250,000 tests in the standard U.S. population.”

These are only two examples out of numerous you will uncover telling you that HIV tests are very correct and are employed to diagnose HIV infection. The so named “rapid tests” are utilized as a screening tool and a optimistic end result need to be confirmed with added testing by means of western blot and elisa testing.  Although the FDA states that a speedy check ought to help in the diagnosis of HIV infection, they nevertheless label it as a diagnostic check with a substantial degree of accuracy.

“The U.S. Meals and Drug Administration today accepted the first speedy Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) check for the simultaneous detection of HIV-1 p24 antigen as nicely as antibodies to the two HIV-one and HIV-two in human serum, plasma, and venous or fingerstick whole blood specimens. Accredited for use as an aid in the diagnosis of HIV-1 and HIV-two infection, the Alere Decide HIV-1/two Ag/Ab Combo test is also the 1st FDA-accredited check that independently distinguishes outcomes for HIV-1 p24 antigen and HIV antibodies in a single check.”

Although the HIV tests are said to be extremely correct and that they detect antibodies which are distinct to HIV, practically nothing can be additional from the reality. In reality, the exams detect generic proteins which could be in your body for numerous motives which could assortment from antibodies developed by vaccination to pregnancy. The checklist of recognized cross reactions is now much more than one hundred and contain the following. References can be identified at

  • Anti-carbohydrate antibodies
  • Naturally-happening antibodies
  • Passive immunization: receipt of gamma globulin or immune globulin (as prophylaxis towards infection which is made up of antibodies)
  • Leprosy
  • Tuberculosis
  • Mycobacterium avium
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Renal (kidney) failure
  • Hemodialysis/renal failure
  • Alpha interferon therapy in hemodialysis individuals
  • Flu
  • Flu vaccination
  • Herpes simplex I
  • Herpes simplex II
  • Upper respiratory tract infection (cold or flu)
  • Current viral infection or exposure to viral vaccines
  • Pregnancy in multiparous females
  • Malaria
  • High levels of circulating immune complexes
  • Hypergammaglobulinemia (substantial levels of antibodies)
  • False positives on other exams, which includes RPR (speedy plasma reagent) test for syphilis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Hepatitis B vaccination
  • Tetanus vaccination
  • Organ transplantation
  • Renal transplantation
  • Anti-lymphocyte antibodies
  • Anti-collagen antibodies (found in gay guys, haemophiliacs, Africans of each sexes and men and women with leprosy)
  • Serum-constructive for rheumatoid issue, antinuclear antibody (the two located in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoantibodies)
  • Autoimmune illnesses: Systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, connective tissue condition, dermatomyositis
  • Acute viral infections, DNA viral infections
  • Malignant neoplasms (cancers)
  • Alcoholic hepatitis/alcoholic liver illness
  • Principal sclerosing cholangitis
  • Hepatitis
  • “Sticky” blood (in Africans)
  • Antibodies with a higher affinity for polystyrene (utilised in the check kits)
  • Blood transfusions, several blood transfusions
  • A number of myeloma
  • HLA antibodies (to Class I and II leukocyte antigens)
  • Anti-smooth muscle antibody
  • Anti-parietal cell antibody
  • Anti-hepatitis A IgM (antibody)
  • Anti-Hbc IgM
  • Administration of human immunoglobulin preparations pooled before 1985
  • Haemophilia
  • Haematologic malignant problems/lymphoma
  • Main biliary cirrhosis
  • Stevens-Johnson syndrome
  • Q-fever with related hepatitis
  • Heat-taken care of specimens
  • Lipemic serum (blood with substantial ranges of fat or lipids)
  • Haemolyzed serum (blood in which haemoglobin is separated from the red cells)
  • Hyperbilirubinemia
  • Globulins created throughout polyclonal gammopathies (which are witnessed in AIDS danger groups)
  • Healthier men and women as a outcome of poorly-understood cross-reactions
  • Standard human ribonucleoproteins
  • Other retroviruses
  • Anti-mitochondrial antibodies
  • Anti-nuclear antibodies
  • Anti-microsomal antibodies
  • T-cell leukocyte antigen antibodies
  • Proteins on the filter paper
  • Epstein-Barr virus
  • Visceral leishmaniasis
  • Receptive anal intercourse

Trisha Morrison, widow of heavyweight boxing champion Tommy Morrison has been fighting for the truth given that the passing of her husband at the beginning of September, 2013. Tommy tested optimistic on an HIV test in 1996 and several individuals believed that the wellness issues he was struggling from and that eventually led to his death were the trigger of him getting HIV contaminated and struggling from superior AIDS. The truth is that the negligence of the hospital workers who had been in charge of his care brought on a cascade of events which ended in his death as explained in the following press release from Trisha Morrison.


“Tommy Morrison is not too long ago deceased, and the physician who attended him at his death has unequivocally established that Mr. Morrison DID NOT die from AIDS, nor was Mr. Morrison discovered to be infected with HIV. Thus, it would each be irresponsible and inexcusable for web sites and authors of content articles to fail to publicly acknowledge the details, as stated over.

“A physician was instructed to take samples of Tommy Morrison’s blood, at the time of his death these samples had been examined by the hospital’s Division of Surgical Pathology, and were very carefully imaged employing electron microscopy (EM). The resulting report, as produced by the pathologist and attending doctors, states the following (this is a direct quote):

“”Rapid Electron Microscopy Evaluation: No viral particles identified.”

“”Electron Microscopy of Buffy Coat Layer: The electron micrographs contained monocytes, lymphocytes, occasional neutrophils and nucleated red cells…there is focal thickening of the cytoplasmic membrane nevertheless no retroviral budding is existing. The cytoplasm includes Golgi apparatus, and occasional strands of rough endoplasmic reticulum, with no abnormality. No retroviral inclusions or tubular aggregates have been existing.
The pericytoplasmic space was examined. No retroviral particles have been observed.”

“”Final Diagnosis: Monocytic cells steady with peripheral blood buffy coat layer. No viral particles noticed.”

“Tommy Morrison died of problems secondary to many years of health care mismanagement, soon after obtaining initial been falsely diagnosed as being “HIV- positive” and then falsely diagnosed and handled for possessing HIV-AIDS. This epic tragedy Have to be effectively acknowledged by the sporting industry (particularly the World Boxing Association, and ESPN) and effectively reported on, to the Public”


“Dr. Jonas Moses
“(technical/scientific consultant to Mr. and Mrs. Tommy Morrison)”

Launched To The Press: October 2, 2013 with the Permission of Mrs Trisha Morrison
E-mail Speak to: Trisha Morrison on”

Trisha Morrison contacted Walter Gardner, Chief, Client Affairs Branch, Division of Communication and Consumer Affairs, Meals and Drug Administration for inquiries with regards to the exams and the science behind HIV only to by no means receive direct solutions to her inquiries. 1 e-mail from Gardner, a response to the inquiries Trisha was asking, was pretty exciting.

“Thank you for your continued interest, but we are not capable to comment on HIV diagnostics not reviewed and accredited by the FDA. As far as licensed HIV screening and diagnostic tests, we have answered all of your queries and presented you with back links to the suitable background details. In fact, all of the publically accessible details on HIV check kits is obtainable on our site at the following website link: [ ]

Since we have offered you with all the data we have to share concerning HIV test kits, we will no longer reply to future e-mail from you on this subject. We are not ready to aid you in figuring out whether or not or not your husband truly had an HIV infection.


Walter Gardner

Chief, Consumer Affairs Branch

Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research”

“Mr. Gardner -


Thank you for your email.


Thank you for providing me with no matter what info the FDA has with regards to ”HIV.”

I appreciate your try to react despite your/FDA lack of understanding whether or not antibodies are contagious or not and your lack of scientific proof of any “isolation or purification” of the actual “HIV Virus”.


I quote your e-mail below:

“We are not able to aid you in identifying whether or not or not your husband really had an HIV infection.”


I would like to thank you and the FDA for your written confirmation  above that no “FDA licensed/approved  HIV tests” are capable to help in determining whether or not or not a person really has “HIV” infection.


As Chief you should possibly report that to the head of the FDA so that you can erase the word “diagnostic” off your web site for the safety of the standard public.


Mr.Gardner – if you and the FDA are unable to figure out HIV infection then you and the FDA are certainly not in a position to figure out the presence of “antibodies” to an HIV infection.


Mark 4:22..For whatever is hidden is meant to be disclosed, and what ever is concealed is meant to be brought out in the open”


Most helpful – I will certainly quote you in all my future interviews and press releases.


God Bless

Trisha Morrison”




We are not able to help you in identifying no matter whether or not your husband truly had an HIV infection? Anyone can do some simple analysis on the internet and recognize that HIV exams approved by the FDA are labelled as diagnostic tests. If the tests are labelled as diagnostic, specific to HIV and highly exact as claimed why can not the FDA assist in identifying whether or not Tommy had an HIV infection? At least they could of stated that contemplating the accuracy of the diagnostic test, Tommy was HIV contaminated but that there are quite uncommon cross reactions which is up to the medical professional to recognize and rule out after examining the patient. The scary part is that the physician who gave Tommy the check admits to in no way have diagnosed him with HIV and that it’s up to the labs to truly come to the conclusion of a diagnosis while the lab says it’s the medical doctor who need to be responsible for the diagnosis.


The fallacies behind HIV testing and the total HIV/AIDS paradigm is some thing of monumental proportions and a lot of who are conscious of this issue consider it a crime towards humanity. The CDC is urging doctors to incorporate HIV testing as part of their patient’s healthcare. President Barack Obama’s HIV Care Continuum Initiative calls for mandatory HIV testing for every person 15 to 65. Many men and women appear to care far more about other well being issues than they do about HIV due to the fact they believe it does not influence them and a lot of have forgotten about this situation altogether or do not think it to be the deadly plague it utilised to be several years ago ahead of the development of new antiretroviral therapies.


A optimistic HIV test for a lot of individuals is devastating. The fear of the virus itself is ample to cause sickness and psychiatric troubles in folks as well as destroying relationships, families, careers etc. People who have been labelled HIV constructive are unable to get non biased healthcare due to the fact no matter what is the underlying situation of the health care situation they may be struggling from, all the medical doctor can see is the virus.


The antiretroviral medicine itself is very toxic and triggers a record of debilitating and deadly side effects to the point of getting labelled as black boxed medication by the FDA the group in which the most deadly pharmaceuticals are placed. It’s time to begin questioning and demanding answers since rather soon this might be one thing which will affect us all even these who are not considered at danger for contracting HIV.When you think about all the possible cross reactions, the non specificity of the check and that a good end result could probably ruin your life would you consider an HIV test?


I know I wouldn’t.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>