Occasionally it is astonishing how ignorant individuals can be. Now it is the turn of followers of “raw milk,” a new fad that is sweeping the U.S.
I nonetheless don’t forget reading milk cartons as a kid, and asking my mothers and fathers what “pasteurized” meant. Although I really do not bear in mind precisely what they stated, I’m positive they informed me that it produced the milk risk-free by killing bacteria. Even as a child, I understood that bacteria in my milk were most likely a bad factor.
Louis Pasteur is one of the most renowned scientists in background, and rightly so. In 1862, he invented the process of heating milk to destroy the bacteria in it. Pasteurization, as we now phone it, has saved hundreds of thousands of lives in the 150 many years because. Pasteur also created the initial vaccine for rabies. He was a real giant.
Followers of raw milk appear to be stunningly unaware of Pasteur’s achievements, and equally ignorant of the dangers of bacterial infections. Several of the overall health and safety claims for raw milk can be identified on websites this kind of as RealMilk.com, a site that is chock total of:
- Conspiracy theories: the Government is hiding the truth from you.
- Denialism: raw milk by no means hurt anyone, and even protects you towards bacteria.
- Shifting the blame: infections are brought on by other contaminated foods, not raw milk.
A single of the more chilling information about RealMilk.com is their emphasis on feeding raw milk to infants, who are at the greatest risk of dying from infections. Their “Campaign for Real Milk” advocates
“universal accessibility to clean raw complete milk from pasture-fed cows, especially entry for pregnant and nursing mothers and for babies and developing children.”
We have a lot of good science about raw milk. CDC review of infectious illness outbreaks across the U.S. from 1993-2006 found that
“The price of outbreaks brought on by unpasteurized milk (often referred to as raw milk) and merchandise made from it was 150 times higher than outbreaks linked to pasteurized milk.”
Dr. Robert Tauxe, an infectious condition specialist at the CDC, debunks some of the myths about raw milk in an report freely available on Medscape. John Snyder and Mark Crislip have the two written compellingly about the dangers of raw milk at sciencebasedmedicine.org.
If I have been getting cynical, I might say that the wild-eyed proponents of raw milk deserve no matter what infections they get. But their young children really don’t. three-12 months-outdated Kylee Youthful, who the Washington Submit wrote about this previous Sunday, did not deserve to endure kidney failure and a stroke following her mom fed her raw milk that was contaminated with E. coli O157:H7. Kylee can no longer walk or speak and requirements continual care. Her mother now says
“If I had identified what I know now, I would by no means have fed [raw milk] to my daughter.”
Louis Pasteur and his wife had 5 kids, three of whom died of childhood infections. These tragedies have been Pasteur’s determination for learning infectious disease. Thanks to his operate 150 many years ago, no 1 these days requirements to die from consuming unpasteurized milk. The raw milk motion insists, despite the evidence, that they know greater.
So go ahead, drink your raw milk and eat a paleo diet too, even though you are at it. But do not ask our contemporary health-related system to spend for your therapy when you get sick. And most of all, really don’t subject innocent youngsters to the needless hazards of raw milk.