Tag Archives: preserve

The Charlie Gard case is a sad reminder that the law is the preserve of the powerful | Anne Perkins

The law says the best interests of the child always come first. But deciding what those are can be a matter of anguished contention. Connie Yates and Chris Gard, the parents of Charlie Gard, the little boy born with an extremely rare form of mitochondrial mutation, were told by a judge yesterday that it was not in their son’s best interests for him to be taken to the US for experimental treatment, and they think the judge was wrong.

The judge, Mr Justice Francis, who told doctors at Great Ormond Street that they could withdraw all but palliative care, was to all intents and purposes delivering a death sentence. He knew that. They knew that.

What was extraordinary is that the state – our representative in court – says that although it rightly felt it had a duty to protect Charlie, it had no role in making sure that his parents’ view of what was in his interest was properly represented. Yates and Gard were not entitled to legal aid. The judge told the court that he found this “remarkable”. This is not the sort of thing judges normally say.

Charlie Gard


‘The judge…was to all intent and purposes delivering a death sentence. He knew that.’ Photograph: Family handout/PA

Fortunately for the parents, they found a legal team through the solicitors Bindmans, who were prepared to work for free. They did not end up, as people in private law cases often do, faced with a choice between representing themselves or not going to court at all. It is all the more absurd that had it been a question of whether Charlie should be taken into care – a life-changing but not a life-threatening decision – the state would have paid for their lawyers. That is because the case would have involved a local authority, another public body. Yet for Charlie’s parents, it would be hard to distinguish between a well-funded public body like a council, and another – the NHS.

This is not about the rights and wrongs of this heart-rending case, where Charlie’s parents wanted to overrule the doctors who felt it would be painful and futile, and take their son to the US in the very remote hope that an entirely untested treatment might help him. But it is a reminder of the way that in other courts the state is skewing the balance of justice in its own interests. The law is becoming the preserve of the powerful.

The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas said as much more than a year ago when he used his annual report to highlight the injustice of a system where the law was unaffordable to all but the rich. He repeated the criticism in his report for 2016: “A properly funded justice system is a core function of the state”, a role that included “holding the democratic government to account and ensuring it acts fairly and according to law”.

It is shocking to discover that even in a case where the court is having to decide a matter that is literally a choice between life and death, there is no legal aid. But it is only the most shocking of a long list of areas where it is no longer possible to get state help to challenge a perceived injustice: the list includes housing, welfare, debt, immigration, medical negligence and family law cases, unless they involve domestic violence. There are prohibitive charges on employment tribunals, which even the Ministry of Justice now acknowledges as creating unintended consequences. A 500% increase in fees for immigration and asylum appeals was only rescinded after a nationwide campaign.

This is the work of Chris Grayling, the most disastrous justice secretary yet appointed, who was in the post between 2012 and 2015. With apparently only the haziest grasp of how access to justice is a cornerstone of the constitution, in his three years as minister he took a machete to the whole system. His successors have been trying to patch it up ever since.

Excluding citizens from access to the law is a process of disempowerment. That is bad enough. What is worse still is that it enhances the lethal sense of government and its agencies that they will not be held to account. Lawyers are not often regarded as heroes of society. But a just society can’t do without them.

Avoid the Dangerous Stuff: five Natural Makeup Guidelines to Support Preserve You All-natural

Organic and all-normal are buzzwords nowadays, and for excellent cause. Research has uncovered growing quantities of evidence linking chemical compounds to a broad selection of health troubles, this kind of as cancer and autoimmune dysfunction. Luckily, cosmetic companies now make a selection of top quality and attractive organic makeup. If you are new to the greener side of makeup, here’s a number of ideas to assist you get your bearings.

Really don’t Trust Each Label

A great deal of lesser-known firms will place misleading labels on their goods to make you think the makeup is all natural. The reality is, unless you are acquiring from a respected retailer, you need to have to make certain you are reading and comprehending ingredient labels. Because the cosmetic business is not regulated by the FDA’s natural standards, purchase only from merchants you can believe in.

Organic Can be Cost-effective

While it is accurate that organic and normal products cost much more, you can nevertheless bargain shop for what you want. Many more substantial cosmetic organizations are now focusing on generating natural or natural makeup. Several merchants provide aggressive coupons that can put attractiveness primarily based on great health nicely inside your monetary signifies.

There’s an App for That

The components in many cosmetics have extended and perplexing names. Often, the exact same ingredient is referred to in a different way in between brands. There are apps obtainable for download on smartphones and tablets that help you to appear up substances and figure out what specifically you’re placing on your skin.

Do not Neglect Sun Protection

Steering clear of wrinkles and spots is a elegance simple. Making use of sunscreen every day underneath your makeup is vital for preserving your youthful good seems to be. A lot of natural sunscreens are available, so you can switch to a more healthy lotion without sacrificing UV protection.

Not All Organics Are Appropriate for Everyone

Natural cosmetic ingredients will react in a different way with each and every personal. For instance, somebody with sensitive skin need to avoid crucial oils, even though a individual prone to pimples and breakouts should keep away from oil-primarily based moisturizers. As with all cosmetics, organic goods must be evaluated for possible allergens or adverse effects ahead of use.

Organic and all-normal beauty supplies are right here to remain. They are far better for the setting and far better for your overall health, so there’s no reason to hesitate about switching from chemically-laden merchandise to more purely developed beauty goods. With the assortment of natural makeup that is now widely accessible, radiant beauty that is based on very good wellness is simpler than ever to achieve!

Author Bio: Rachelle Wilber is a freelance author living in the San Diego, California area. She graduated from San Diego State University with her Bachelor’s Degree in Journalism and Media Scientific studies. To help you conserve cash on higher-high quality natural makeup, she suggests utilizing coupons or price reduction codes to cosmetics professionals like Ulta from spots this kind of as discountrue.com. Comply with her on twitter: @RachelleWilber

WHO calls for urgent action to preserve energy of antibiotics and make new ones

Pneumonia will again turn out to be a feared killer, surgical procedure risky and diarrhoea fatal if urgent action is not taken to protect the energy of existing antibiotics as properly as build new ones, the Globe Well being Organisation has warned on Wednesday.

In its initial investigation of the extent of antimicrobial resistance across the planet, the WHO said we are dealing with a massive risk to public wellness, which could affect anybody of any age.

No nation is immune, as bacteria and viruses resistant to medication travel the globe with ease.

In the Uk, as elsewhere, there is rising concern about infections from Klebsiella pneumoniae, bacterium carried in the intestines which has turn into resistant to the final line of antibiotics accessible, the carbapanems. In fragile individuals on intensive care wards and newborn babies, these infections can be fatal. Meanwhile, sexually transmitted gonorrhoea is on the improve and is also resistant to the final-resort antibiotics utilised to deal with it.

“Without urgent, coordinated action by many stakeholders, the world is headed for a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries which have been treatable for decades can as soon as yet again destroy,” mentioned Dr Keiji Fukuda, WHO’s assistant director basic for health safety.

“Successful antibiotics have been one particular of the pillars allowing us to dwell longer, reside more healthy, and benefit from modern day medicine. Except if we take important actions to increase efforts to stop infections and also adjust how we make, prescribe and use antibiotics, the globe will lose more and far more of these worldwide public overall health items, and the implications will be devastating.”

Wednesday’s report is the first to gather complete data from the WHO on antibiotic resistance and has info from 114 nations. Even though the information is much more full in some areas than in other folks, it is clear that drug-resistant strains of bacteria and viruses are frequent and that striving to preserve the efficacy of present antibiotics is a shedding battle.

“We know that the pathogens are everywhere. They have been right here prior to humanity,” Dr Carmen Pessoa Da Silva, staff leader on antimicrobial resistance at WHO, advised the Guardian. “It is not a dilemma of a single nation or single region. It is a issue that belongs to the total planet. This is essential. No single country even with the greatest possible policies in spot can deal with this issue alone. We want all countries to get together and examine and put in practice feasible options.”

The report raises worries about drug-resistant tuberculosis, which is spreading and calls for far more than a 12 months of therapy with combinations of antibiotics that are unaffordable in some nations. It also seems at the rise of remedy-resistant strains of HIV, which is common in Europe and north America.

But the report’s principal target is 7 bacteria accountable for typical infections that are now at times life-threatening since of antibiotic resistance. The most worrying findings are the globally drug-resistant K pneumoniae, the therapy failures in gonorrhoea in 10 countries – which includes the United kingdom – and the widespread resistance to fluoroquinolones – a single of the most widely utilized antibacterial medicines for the treatment of urinary tract infections induced by E coli.

New medication are not on the horizon. There have been no new courses of antibiotics for 25 years, mentioned Dr Danilo Lo Fo Wong, senior adviser on antimicrobial resistance to WHO Europe.

Pharmaceutical firms can not cover the costs of research and development, due to the fact new antibiotics have to be used sparingly for fear of resistance developing – and when that begins, they have a brief lifespan. “New antibiotics coming on to the industry are not truly new,” Lo Fo Wong stated. “They are variations of those we previously have.” That means that bacteria are likely to create resistance to them that significantly sooner.

“We see treatment failure and we see people die because they are not handled in time,” he mentioned. “In some elements of the world, it is about availability.” But in other individuals, patients are taken care of with one antibiotic soon after another to attempt to find some thing that functions, escalating the danger to them due to the fact they become more sick and also further driving resistance. Some countries in Europe do not instantly carry out tests to establish what the infection is, particularly if there are added costs to the hospital or patient.

The WHO urges all nations to be more sparing in their use of antibiotics in people and in animals and improve hand hygiene, which has been credited with minimizing the numbers of instances in the United kingdom of the “superbug” MRSA – staphylococcus aureus – that is resistant to the antibiotic methicillin.

The health-related charity Médecins Sans Frontières said a worldwide strategy for the rational use of reasonably priced antibiotics was urgently necessary.

“We see horrendous prices of antibiotic resistance wherever we appear in our discipline operations, including young children admitted to dietary centres in Niger, and individuals in our surgical and trauma units in Jordan,” stated Dr Jennifer Cohn, health-related director of the MSF Access Campaign. “Countries require to improve their surveillance of antimicrobial resistance, as otherwise our actions are just a shot in the dark with out this data, physicians don’t know the extent of the difficulty and can’t consider the correct clinical choices required.

“In the end, WHO’s report ought to be a wake-up phone to governments to introduce incentives for market to develop new, reasonably priced antibiotics that do not rely on patents and high prices and are adapted to the requirements of building countries.”

British experts agreed on the urgency of the problem. “The world demands to respond as it did to the Aids crisis of the 1980s,” mentioned Laura Piddock, professor of microbiology at University of Birmingham and director of the campaigning group Antibiotic Action. “To do this, we need to be ambitious to do well.”

Necessary and funded international surveillance and public training campaigns were important, she additional, “but these are just commencing points. We even now need to have a greater knowing of all elements of resistance as nicely as new discovery, research and improvement of new antibiotics.” Nonetheless, United kingdom government funding for antibiotic investigation had dwindled, Piddock warned.

Prof Martin Adams, president of the Society for Utilized Microbiology, also named for much more investigation into how resistance develops in the two human and animal antibiotic use. “Even if there are new antimicrobial drugs brought to industry, we will even now encounter the spectre of resistance unless we can understand how to minimise or slow its improvement,” he stated.

English: Euler diagram representing the relati...

7 Servings Of Vegetables A Day May possibly Preserve Death Away

Adding to the mind-boggling evidence that the street to overall health is paved with plants, a new study in BMJ nowadays finds that consuming 7 servings of fruits and veggies per day minimizes one’s death risk significantly. Researchers followed a nationally representiave sample of in excess of 65,000 individuals in Britain, and located that people who ate far more fruits and veggies have been much significantly less probably to die of any result in. In certain, they had been much less likely to die of heart condition, stroke, and cancer. And, happily, the a lot more fruits and veggies the men and women consumed, the a lot more their death risk fell.

“We all know that eating fruit and vegetables is healthful, but the size of the impact is staggering,” mentioned examine writer Oyinlola Oyebode of her team’s findings. Oyebode is a researcher in the Epidemiology and Public Well being at University College London.

English: Euler diagram representing the relati...

Euler diagram representing the partnership amongst (botanical) fruits and vegetables. Botanical fruits that are not greens are culinary fruits. (Photograph credit score: Wikipedia)

She and her staff used information from the Overall health Survey for England, looking at a random sampling of British citizens in excess of an average follow-up time period of 7.five years. Above the program of this time, 4,400 individuals died of different causes, and the researchers identified some considerable associations amongst diet plan and death chance.

For individuals who ate seven or much more servings of fruits and veggies per day, their risk of dying from any trigger was diminished by 42%, in contrast to folks who ate much less than a single serving per day. And their chance of dying from cancer and heart illness was diminished by 25% and 31%, respectively.

Even men and women who ate diet plans that have been somewhat much less vegetable- and fruit-wealthy appeared to reap some rewards. Individuals who ate one-3 servings of fruits and veggies per day loved a 14% decreased mortality danger people who ate 3-5 servings per day, were 29% significantly less most likely to die and these consuming 5-seven servings had a 35% decrease risk of death (yet again, in contrast to people who ate significantly less than serving per day).

The trends held strong when the researchers adjusted for other likely confounding factors like age, smoking, alcohol intake, socioeconomic status, Physique Mass Index, education, and bodily exercise level.

Interestingly, when the effects of the two were teased apart, veggies seemed to offer you higher safety than fruits. Every single added serving of vegetables was linked to a sixteen% reduction in mortality, in contrast to 10% for fruits.

“The clear message right here is that the far more fruit and greens you consume, the much less probably you are to die at any age,” explained Oyebode. “Vegetables have a larger result than fruit, but fruit even now can make a genuine distinction. If you’re pleased to snack on carrots or other vegetables, then that is a excellent decision but if you fancy anything sweeter, a banana or any fruit will also do you great.”

It need to be explained, the study only pointed to a correlation amongst fruits and veggies and mortality – it did not demonstrate causation. Nonetheless, the research was properly-executed and factors to a powerful connection. It also confirms what we currently suspected from prior study.

Adding a slight and possibly not surprising twist is the truth that frozen and canned fruits and greens appeared to boost the death chance by 17%. As the authors of an accompanying editorial muse, “might refined sugars be acting as the concealed villain in this Shakespearean drama? Take into account, gentle reader.” Although frozen and canned fruits were lumped collectively in the study, since Brits eat four times as numerous canned as frozen fruits, it’s very likely, the authors say, that this form of fruit – and as a result, sugar – was actually behind the result.

The U.S. dropped the “5-a-day” slogan back in 2007, favoring “Fruits and Veggies – A lot more Matters,” but other parts of the globe still suggest five servings of fruits and veggies per day. But since most men and women really don’t get five servings in per day, asking men and women to up their consumption could be tricky, especially given that fresh fruits and vegetables can be pricey.

If you can enhance your consumption, fantastic. If not, don’t fret. Just get in what you can, because there’s nevertheless benefit derived from every serving of fruits and greens you take in. Oyebode urges the public not to “feel daunted by a big target like 7. What ever your beginning level, it is usually worth consuming a lot more fruit and greens. In our examine even those eating one particular to three portions had a drastically reduced danger than individuals eating significantly less than one particular.”

Adhere to me @alicewalton or discover me on Facebook.

Courtesy BMJ

Courtesy BMJ

Widow wins battle to preserve dead husband’s sperm – video

Beth Warren speaks outside the large court in London soon after winning her fight to preserve her late husband’s sperm. The ruling will let her to, if she chooses in the long term, have his kid. The 28-yr-outdated widow, a physiotherapist from Birmingham, had challenged a storage time restrict imposed by the United kingdom fertility regulator, which meant she had just more than a year to conceive